I'm coming from a UNIX environment using Server Express. Now I want to make the switch as stated above. Where is a good place to start learning how to fit in this new environ. I want to write a little program to use these tools with data in an SQL database.
The book is excellent. I have one problem with the code in the book, where can I
find the syntax for this code? For example I see a version of the "move" verb that I
am not familare with. Is there a central place for the MF COBOL and Visual Studio
syntax?
Permalink Reply by Robb on October 29, 2008 at 12:02pm
I would suggest to start with .Net first, such as ADO, ADO+, Winforms, because .Net Express is just an additional tool for .Net.
Also Cobollers are some sort of slowly dying dynos, you want to fit the market - you start learning OOP principles, which are the basis for .Net.
Maybe learning how to use .Net Cobol you will put it on the shelf, and start new era in your life - OOP and Components based programming.
It should take one year of hardworking if you smart enough, then at least you are not dyno anymore. )))))
Thanks for the reply. I have studied OOP. I need to stay with MF COBOL because
of "legacy" applications. I am going through the Visual Studio 2005 book and I came
across some syntax that I can't find the def for. That is my question.
First, what is the syntax you're referring to. I'll be glad to help. 2ndly, it won't take a year.
Believe it or not there are only a handful of syntax enhancements to cobol to allow you to work with .NET object, classes, methods, properties, etc....but it is not that much to learn. The key is to start small and take in the .NET pieces you're trying to do and gradually build on them
Thanks for the reply. I am studying Visual Studio (2005) from the MF book by Price
and Ripkin. I came across a MOVE FORWARD statement and I just need to know where
can I find the COBOL syntax (in general). I found some information on the MicroSoft
"Help" web pages.
I have to guess without seeing the complete statement that there is a typo in the book. As far as can tell there is no FORWARD clause on the MOVE statement. In fact, FORWARD doesn't even to seem to be a reserved word.